🔗 Share this article

Government closures are a repeat element of US politics – but the current situation appears especially difficult to resolve due to shifting political forces and bad blood between the two parties.

Certain federal operations face a temporary halt, with approximately 750,000 people are expected to be put on unpaid leave since both political parties remain unable to reach consensus on a spending bill.

Legislative attempts to resolve the deadlock continue to fall short, and it is hard to see a clear resolution path this time because both parties – as well as the nation's leader – perceive advantages in maintaining their positions.

Here are several key factors in which things feel different in 2025.

1. For Democrats, it's about Trump – not just healthcare

Democratic supporters have insisted over recent periods that their party more forcefully fights the Trump administration. Currently the party leadership has a chance to show they have listened.

In March, the Senate's top Democrat was fiercely criticised after supporting GOP budget legislation and averting a shutdown in the spring. This time he's digging in.

This is a chance for Democrats to show their ability to reclaim certain authority from a presidency that has moved aggressively with determined action.

Opposing the Republican spending plan carries electoral dangers as citizens generally may become impatient as the dispute drags on and impacts accumulate.

The Democrats are using the shutdown fight to put a spotlight on ending healthcare financial support together with GOP-backed federal health program reductions affecting low-income populations, which are both unpopular.

They are also trying to restrict executive utilization of presidential authority to rescind or withhold money approved by Congress, which he has done in international assistance and other programmes.

Second, For Republicans, it's an opportunity

The President along with a senior aide have openly indicated of the fact that they smell a chance to advance further the cutbacks in government employment that have featured the current presidential term so far.

The nation's leader personally said last week that the government closure had afforded him a "unique chance", adding he intended to reduce funding for "opposition-supported departments".

The White House said it would be left with a "challenging responsibility" of mass lay-offs to maintain critical federal operations should the impasse persist. An administration spokesperson said this was just "budgetary responsibility".

The scope of the potential lay-offs is still uncertain, though administration officials has been in discussions with federal budget authorities, or OMB, under the leadership of the administration's budget director.

The budget director has previously declared the halting of government financial support for Democratic-run parts the opposition party, such as NYC and Illinois' largest city.

Third, Trust Is Lacking between both parties

Whereas past government closures typically involved extended negotiations among political opponents aimed at restoring federal operations, there appears to be minimal cooperative willingness of collaboration this time.

Conversely, animosity prevails. The bad blood persisted recently, as both sides blaming each other for causing the impasse.

House Speaker a Republican, accused Democrats of not being serious about negotiating, and maintaining positions during discussions "to get political cover".

Simultaneously, the opposition's chief made similar charges against their counterparts, saying that a Republican promise regarding health funding talks once the government reopens can not be taken seriously.

The administration leader personally has inflamed the situation by posting a controversial AI-generated image of the Senate leader along with another senior in the House, in which the legislator is depicted with traditional headwear and a moustache.

The representative with party colleagues denounced this as discriminatory, a characterization rejected by the administration's second-in-command.

Fourth, The American Economy faces vulnerability

Analysts expect about 40% of government employees – over 800,000 workers – to be put on unpaid leave due to the shutdown.

This will reduce consumer expenditure – with broader economic consequences, as environmental permitting, patent approvals, payments to contractors along with various forms of government activity tied to business comes to a halt.

A shutdown also injects new uncertainty within economic systems already being roiled from multiple factors including tariffs, earlier cuts to government spending, immigration raids and artificial intelligence.

Economic forecasters project that it could shave approximately 0.2% off US economic growth weekly during the closure.

But the economy typically recoups most of that lost activity following resolution, similar to recovery patterns caused by a natural disaster.

That could be one reason why the stock market has appeared largely unfazed to the ongoing impasse.

On the other hand, analysts say that if the President carries out his threat of mass firings, the damage could be more long-lasting.